Dr. George Carlo was the scientist funded with $25 million by the cell phone industry to research cell phone radiation and to prove through scientific studies that the phones are safe.
After six years of study Dr. Carlo determined that cell phone radiation disrupted heart pacemakers, damaged the blood-brain barrier, penetrates the skulls of children and does genetic damage that can result in cancer.
Dr. Carlo presented these findings to the cell phone industry and when he refused to recant the findings his research funds were cut-off and a publicity campaign to discredit him was put in effect.
Dr. Carlo is extremely concerned about public health and has gone public with his information in the book:
Cell Phones:
Invisible Hazards of the Wireless Age
His
website: www.safewireless.org
Serious Public Health
Concerns Raised Over Exposure to
Electromagnetic
Fields (EMF) from Power
Lines and Cell Phones
University of Albany, New York– August
31/2007
An international working group of
scientists, researchers and public health policy professionals
(The BioInitiative Working Group) has released its report on
electromagnetic fields (EMF) and health. It raises serious
concern about the safety of existing public limits that
regulate how much EMF is allowable from power lines, cell
phones, and many other sources of EMF exposure in daily
life.
Electromagnetic radiation from such sources as
electric power lines, interior wiring and grounding of
buildings and appliances are linked to increased risks for
childhood leukemia and may set the stage for adult cancers
later in life. A report from the BioInitiative Working Group
(www.bioinitiative.org
) released on Friday, August
31st documents the scientific evidence that
power line EMF exposure is responsible for hundreds of new
cases of childhood leukemia every year in the United States
and around the world.
The report provides detailed
scientific information on health impacts when people are
exposed to electromagnetic radiation hundreds or even
thousands of times below limits currently established by the
Federal Communications Commission (US FCC) and International
Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection in Europe
(ICNIRP). The authors reviewed more than 2000 scientific
studies and reviews, and concluded that the existing public
safety limits are inadequate to protect public health. From a
public health policy standpoint, new public safety limits, and
limits on further deployment of risky technologies are
warranted based on the total weigh of evidence.
The report documents scientific
evidence raising worries about childhood leukemia (from power
lines and other electrical exposures), brain tumors and
acoustic neuromas (from cell and cordless phones) and
Alzheimer’s disease. There is evidence that EMF is a risk
factor for both childhood and adult cancers.
Public health expert and co-editor
of the Report Dr. David Carpenter, Director, Institute for
Health and the Environment at the University of Albany, New
York says “
this
report stands as a wake-up call that long-term exposure to
some kinds of EMF may cause serious health effects. Good
public health planning is needed now to prevent cancers and
neurological diseases linked to exposure to power lines and
other sources of EMF. We need to educate people and our
decisionmakers that “business as usual” is
unacceptable.”
Health questions about power line
EMFs were initially raised by Nancy Wertheimer, a Colorado
public health expert and Ed Leeper, an electrical engineer in
1979. Wertheimer noticed that children were twice or three
times as
likely to
have leukemia tended to live in homes in the Denver, CO area
close to power lines and transformers. Now, there are dozens
of studies confirming the link, but public health response has
been slow in coming, and new standards to protect the public
are necessary.
Brain tumor specialist Dr. Lennart
Hardell, MD, PhD and Professor at University Hospital in
Orebro, Sweden is a member of the BioInitiative Working Group.
His work on cell phones, cordless phones and brain tumors is
widely recognized to be pivotal in the debate about the safety
of wireless radiofrequency and microwave
radiation
. “The
evidence for risks from prolonged cell phone and cordless
phone use is quite strong when you look at people who have
used these devices for 10 years or longer, and when they are
used mainly on one side of the head.
Brain tumors normally take a long
time to develop, on the order of 15 to 20 years. Use of a cell
or cordless phone is linked to brain tumors and acoustic
neuromas (tumor of the auditory nerve in the brain) and are
showing up after only 10 years (a shorter time period than for
most other known carcinogens). “
This indicates we need research on
more long-term users to understand the full risks”
says Dr.
Hardell.
Dr. Hardell’s work has been
confirmed in other studies on long-term users. A summary
estimate of all studies on brain tumors shows overall a 20%
increased risk of brain tumor (malignant glioma) with ten
years of use. But the risk increases to 200% (a doubling of
risk) for tumors on the same side of the brainas mainly used
during cell phone calls.
“Recent studies that do not report
increased risk of brain tumors and acoustic neuromas have not
looked at heavy users, use over ten years or longer, and do
not look at the part of the brain which would reasonably have
exposure to produce a tumor.”
Wireless technologies that rely on
microwave radiation to send emails and voice communication are
thousands of times stronger than levels reported to cause some
health impacts. Prolonged exposure to radiofrequency and
microwave radiation from cell phones, cordless phones, cell
towers, WI-FI and other wireless technologies have linked to
physical symptoms including headache, fatigue, sleeplessness,
dizziness, changes in brainwave activity, and impairment of
concentration and memory. Scientists report that these effects
can occur with even very small levels of exposure, if it
occurs on a daily basis. Children in particular are vulnerable
to harm from environmental exposures of all kinds.
Co-editor of the report, Cindy Sage
of Sage Associates says
“public health and EMF policy experts
have now given their opinion of the weight of evidence. The
existing FCC and international limits for public and
occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and
radiofrequency radiation are not protective of public health.
New biologically-based public and occupational exposure are
recommended
to address bioeffects and potential adverse health effects of
chronic exposure. These effects are now widely reported to
occur at exposure levels significantly below most current
national and international limits.”
Biologically-based exposure
standards are needed to prevent disruption of normal body
processes. Effects are reported for DNA damage (genotoxicity
that is directly linked to integrity of the human genome),
cellular communication, cellular metabolism and repair, cancer
surveillance within the body; and forprotection against cancer
and neurological diseases. Also reported are neurological
effects including changes in brainwave activity during cell
phone calls, impairment of memory, attention and cognitive
function; sleep disorders, cardiac effects; and changes in
immune function (allergic and inflammatory
responses).
Sage says
“the Working Group recommends a
biologically-based exposure limit that is protective against
extremely-low frequency (power line) and radiofrequency fields
which, with chronic exposure, can reasonably be presumed to
result in significant impacts to health and
well-being”.
Contributing author Dr. Martin
Blank, Columbia University professor and researcher in
bioelectromagnetics says
“cells in the body react to EMFs as
potentially harmful, just like to other environmental toxins,
including heavy metals and toxic chemicals. The DNA in living
cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at very low levels of
exposure; and produces a biochemical stress response. The
scientific evidence tells us that our safety standards are
inadequate, and that we must protect ourselves from exposure
to EMF due to powerlines, cell phones and the like.”
He wrote the
section on stress proteins for the BioInitiative
Report.